1. There is delay of 888 days in preferring the instant review petition.

1. The appellant is the partnership firm stated to be inter alia engaged in business of construction of residential and commercial buildings. A contract was executed on 13.05.2010 between the parties for construction of 36 Unit...

1. Leave granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad passed in orders in Appeal Nos. 3085 to 3087 of 2007 by which the...

1. Leave granted.

1. Since the facts and the question of law that arises for consideration in all the appeals are similar, all these appeals are being heard and disposed of by the present Judgment.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay at Aurangabad in Writ Petition No. 144 of 2021 by which in a writ petition filed by the...

1. The prosecution alleges that the appellants are members of an organized crime syndicate which has engaged in a systematic course of activities for cheating members of the public by conducting the ‘Mumbai Matka’.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 29.10.2009 whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed, confirming the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Bathinda...

1. Leave granted.