1. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment dated 13/14th March, 2012 passed by the High Court of Bombay, dismissing the challenge laid by them to the order dated 27th December, 2007 passed by the then Chief Minister of the...

1. Special leave granted. With consent of the counsels for the parties, the appeal was heard finally.

1. This appeal by accused no. 31, challenges the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No. 213 of 2006 confirming the conviction of the Appellant imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Guna for...

1. The issue that falls for consideration is whether ‘emulsified bitumen’, which is stated to be a liquid form obtained from the process of heating the ‘bitumen’ at certain temperature, is different and distinct from ‘bitumen’...

1. Application seeking listing of review petition in open Court is rejected.

1. It stands established on record that the Revenue failed to prove proper service of both the Show Cause Notice and the addendum on the Assessee, and a categorical finding returned to this effect by the Customs Excise and...

1. Delay condoned.

1. The appellant is the partnership firm stated to be inter alia engaged in business of construction of residential and commercial buildings. A contract was executed on 13.05.2010 between the parties for construction of 36 Unit...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.