1. The respondent filed a private complaint against the petitioner in the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad, alleging commission of the offence under Section 499, which is punishable under Section...

1. Delay condoned.

1. Heard learned Amicus, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate Mr. Gaurav Agarwal for National Legal Services Authority (hereinafter referred to as “NALSA”) and Additional Solicitor General of India, Ms. Aishwarya Bhati for the...

1. The action that set in motion the instant dispute was in the year 1947, when a mother transferred property inherited at the death of her husband, in one form to her two sons and in another, to her daughter.

Leave granted.

1. Permission to file the Special Leave Petitions granted.

1. Heard.

1. These appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20161 are directed against the judgment and order2 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi3 passed in Company Appeal (AT)...

1. The short question in this appeal is whether the election petition filed against the appellant by the first respondent herein was liable to be rejected at the threshold? The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam answered this...

1. The wheels of justice may grind slow, but they grind fine.