1. Initially, this appeal was preferred by the three accused. Appellant no. 1-Hari Singh (accused no. 1) is no more. The appeal survives insofar as the appellant no. 2-Gopal Singh (accused no. 4) and appellant no. 3-Avtar Singh...

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital dated 8th March 2013, thereby partly allowing the criminal appeal filed by the appellant.

1. The State of Uttarakhand has approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and final order dated 17th July 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No. 207 of...

1. The instant Miscellaneous Application, filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) through its Project Director, seeks clarification regarding the judgment dated 19.09.2019, passed in Civil Appeal No. 7064 of...

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Leave granted.

1. These two appeals impugn a common judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi1 dated 15.11.2018, inter alia, passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1015 of 2017 and 1132 of 2017, whereby the appeals of the appellants...

1. The present petition arises from the Final Order and Judgment dated 03.07.2024 in Application under Section 482 No. 5718 of 2024 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Order’) [2024:AHC-LKO:45305] passed by a learned Single...

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 02.12.2010 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Bombay (High Court) in Criminal Appeal No. 252 of 2005 (Ramu Appa Mahapatar v. State of...