1. This order is necessitated due to a difference of opinion and approach amongst various judgments, on the question of whether, after recording conviction for a capital offence, under law, the court is obligated to conduct a...

1. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.

1. The application for deleting the name of respondent No. 2 herein is allowed at the risk and responsibility of the appellant herein.

2. That the appellant herein has instituted Civil Suit before the Trial Court for specific performance of the Memorandum of Agreement dated 24.02.1996 and the agreement to sell dated 14.05.2011 with regard to the suit land.

2. At the outset, it is required to be noted that the dispute is with respect to Modvat credit on ‘Guide Car’ claimed by the appellant - assessee.

1. Leave granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 21.07.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11120 of 2022, by which, the High Court has...

1. This is a statutory appeal under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. This appeal takes exception to the final judgment and order dated 29th April 2021 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in First Appeal No. 511 of 2016, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the...

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under: