1. Being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 12.09.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 254 of 2004, 258 of 2004, 259 of 2004 by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, the original appellant Khem Singh S/o Tarachand...

1. Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 2353-2354 of 2025 and SLP (C) Diary No. 14577 of 2025.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General (‘ASG’) along with Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel, for the appellant-State and Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel, along with Mr. Siddhartha Dave...

1. Being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 12.09.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 254 of 2004, 258 of 2004, 259 of 2004 by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, the original appellant Khem Singh S/o Tarachand...

1. Being aggrieved by the common order dated 30.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad whereby the High Court while disposing of Criminal Petition Nos. 5270 & 7262 of 2011 refused to quash...

1. Being aggrieved by the common order dated 30.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad whereby the High Court while disposing of Criminal Petition Nos. 5270 & 7262 of 2011 refused to quash...

1. The appellant-State of Punjab is before this Court impugning the judgment of the High Court1 by which the criminal appeals2 filed by the respondents were allowed3 and the judgment4 of the Trial Court5 convicting the...

1. The accused-appellant was tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati1, in Sessions Trial No. 197 of 2006, for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with the allegation that he...