1. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of appeals, all these appeals are decided and disposed of together by this common judgment and order.

1. The short question which arises for our consideration in the present case relates to whether a party to a contract is entitled to question the amount of consideration after signing the contract.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Tripura at Agarthala in Regular Second Appeal No. 01/2005, by which the High Court has allowed the said...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20.02.2019, passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the NCDRC) in First Appeal No...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05.12.2017 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 15720 of 2014 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ...

2. The facts leading to the present appeals in a nutshell are as under:—

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 17.07.2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2989 of 2016 by which the High Court has allowed the said...

1. The above set of appeals were referred to larger Bench of three Judges in terms of the order dated 05.03.2020 which reads as follows:

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court and the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the appellant/LAC before the High Court, it appears that it was the specific case on behalf of the appellant and others...

2. Section 10(26AAA), the vires of which is under challenge reads as under:—