1. Article 30 of the Constitution of India guarantees to religious and linguistic minorities, the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. The issues which arise for adjudication in this...

1. The petitioner which is a company duly incorporated under the laws of the United States of America1 has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under sub-sections (6) and (12) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

1. These two appeals are against common judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras1 dated 19.11.2019 passed in First Appeal No. 328 of 2005 and Cross Objection No. 10 of 2012 preferred against a final decree...

1. This judgment arises from a Writ Petition instituted in 2005 seeking directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities1.

1. In the present batch of appeals, this Court has to decide the contours defining the independence and impartiality of arbitral tribunals under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.1

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:

1. The petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution inter-alia seeking to challenge the validity of the Explanation to Rule 38 of the Mineral (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons...

1. The renowned American poet H. W. Longfellow penned to the effect that a torn jacket might soon be mended, but a bruised heart of a child would be beyond reviviscence. Certainly, it contains the gospel truth as relates a child...

1. Since the captioned petitions raise analogous issues between the same parties, those were taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

1. Leave granted.