1. The appellant/accused - S K Khaja has preferred the present appeal challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 07.01.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal No. 162...

1. The Respondent no. 1- Market Committee had preferred two First Appeals being Nos. 1447 of 2006 and 1490 of 2006 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the award dated 07.03.2006 passed by the II Adhoc...

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent.

1. This appeal arises out of the judgement of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta, dated 16.12.2010, passed in ‘WPST No. 600 of 2010’ filed by respondent Mitul Kumar Jana.

1. These appeals challenge a common judgment of the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court1.

1. The writ petition1 was filed by the appellant in the Gauhati High Court in the year 2008 praying for release of her salary from 12.03.2001 onwards.

1. The Appeals arise from the Judgment dated 24.01.2018 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9988 of 2006 on the file of High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.

1. The appellant is aggrieved by final Order dated 23.02.2017 (Final Order No. 51919/2017) passed in Customs Appeal No. C/52193/2014-Cu(DB) arising out of Order-in-Original No. 68/RKB/CCE/NCH/2013 dated 26.12.2013 passed by the...

1. The appellant is aggrieved by final Order dated 23.02.2017 (Final Order No. 51919/2017) passed in Customs Appeal No. C/52193/2014-Cu(DB) arising out of Order-in-Original No. 68/RKB/CCE/NCH/2013 dated 26.12.2013 passed by the...

1. Leave granted.