1. Being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 12.09.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 254 of 2004, 258 of 2004, 259 of 2004 by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, the original appellant Khem Singh S/o Tarachand...

1. Heard.

2. Heard Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General (‘ASG’) along with Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel, for the appellant-State and Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel, along with Mr. Siddhartha Dave...

1. Being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 12.09.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 254 of 2004, 258 of 2004, 259 of 2004 by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, the original appellant Khem Singh S/o Tarachand...

2. Heard Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General (‘ASG’) along with Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel, for the appellant-State and Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel, along with Mr. Siddhartha Dave...

1. Heard.

1. Heard.

1. Heard.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 2353-2354 of 2025 and SLP (C) Diary No. 14577 of 2025.