1. Leave granted.
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Mukul Kumar Tyagi v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Miscellaneous Application No. ________ of 2024 [@ Diary No. 4407 of 2023] In Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2019
Property Owners Association and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others
1. The reference to this Constitution Bench raises significant questions about Articles 39(b) and 31-C of the Constitution. Answering the reference has been an adventure through the intricacies of constitutional interpretation...
Anjum Kadari and Another v. Union of India and Others
1. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad1 has held the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 20042 to be unconstitutional on the ground that it violates the principle of secularism and Articles 14 and 21A of the...
Karakkattu Muhammed Basheer v. State of Kerala
1. This Appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 18.10.1996 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned judgment”), upholding the order of conviction and sentence...
Nabha Power Limited and Another v. Punjab State Power Coroporation Limited and Another
1. The present appeal arises from the judgment dated 30.06.2014 of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (for short the “APTEL”) in Appeal No. 29 of 2013. By the said judgement, the APTEL dismissed the appeal of the appellant...
Anoop M. and Others v. Gireeshkumar T.M. and Others
1. Leave granted.
Anoop M. and Others v. Gireeshkumar T.M. and Others
1. Leave granted.
Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited and Others v. Bapuna Alcobrew Private Limited and Another
1. The final judgment and order dated 13th October, 20111 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh2, allowing the writ appeal3 presented by the first respondent, is under assail in the present appeal by special leave.
Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited and Others v. Bapuna Alcobrew Private Limited and Another
1. The final judgment and order dated 13th October, 20111 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh2, allowing the writ appeal3 presented by the first respondent, is under assail in the present appeal by special leave.