1. The appellant-landlord has filed the present appeal impugning the judgment of the High Court1 in Second Appeal No. 1623 of 19922.

1. Leave granted.

1. The appellant-landlord has filed the present appeal impugning the judgment of the High Court1 in Second Appeal No. 1623 of 19922.

1. When public institutions depend, day after day, on the same hands to perform permanent tasks, equity demands that those tasks are placed on sanctioned posts, and those workers are treated with fairness and dignity.

1. S.L. Kapoor v. Jagmohan1 is a landmark decision of this Court, delivered more than half a century back, delineating the contours of the principles of natural justice, more particularly the right to be heard before one is...

1. Leave granted.

1. These contempt petitions have been preferred alleging non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court dated 17.01.2018 while dismissing the Civil Appeal Nos. 6732-6733 of 2009, whereby the respondent-Bank was directed to...

1. When public institutions depend, day after day, on the same hands to perform permanent tasks, equity demands that those tasks are placed on sanctioned posts, and those workers are treated with fairness and dignity.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.