1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. In paragraph 178 of the Judgment dated 15th September, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025 and connected matters, there is an error.

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 01.01.2002, the State Task Force Prohibition and Excise Inspector accompanied by other officials, while on patrolling duty near Dayamani Restaurant, Kathipudi village, noticed...