1. The issue that arises for consideration is a matter of great importance, for it requires the court to balance two important values; first, to provide minimum basic housing even to those who are forest dwellers, and the second...

1. Appellant, Satheesh V.K., is a borrower within the meaning of section 2(f) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 20021.

1. Heard Mr. Y. K. Kapur, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. Nisha Bagchi, learned senior counsel for the respondent.

1. Leave granted.

1. Appellant, Satheesh V.K., is a borrower within the meaning of section 2(f) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 20021.

1. Appellant, Satheesh V.K., is a borrower within the meaning of section 2(f) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 20021.

1. Appellant, Satheesh V.K., is a borrower within the meaning of section 2(f) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 20021.

1. Appellant, Satheesh V.K., is a borrower within the meaning of section 2(f) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 20021.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.