1. An important question involving the interpretation of certain provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, (for short “the Act”) arises for consideration in this case.

1. The present appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 4th July 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad1 in Criminal Appeal u/s 374 Cr.P.C. No. 2259 of 1989 filed by the accused...

1. The original claimant, the injured in a motor accident, had filed the above appeal, seeking enhancement of compensation as awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal1 and enhanced by the High Court.

1. The instant contempt petition has been filed under Section 12 and 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and Rule 3 of the Rules to Regulate the Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975 read with Article 129 of...

1. Heard learned counsels for the respective parties.

1. The issue agitated here is that which comes up frequently before this Court; on the question of ‘pay and recover’, the appellants before this Court being either the claimants or the owner of the offending vehicle, depending...

1. The appellants are the claimants who impugn the judgement of the High Court rejecting the claim petition, after reversing the award of the Tribunal.

1. This batch of six appeals are filed under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20161 by erstwhile promoters and various Operational Creditors of the Corporate Debtor against the common final impugned judgment and...

1. Leave granted.

1. The appellants are the claimants who impugn the judgement of the High Court rejecting the claim petition, after reversing the award of the Tribunal.