1. The present appeals assail the reversing judgment of the Karnataka High Court1 setting aside the common order passed by the Additional District Judge Bellary2 under Provincial Insolvency Act, 19203. For the reasons to follow...

1. The present appeals assail the reversing judgment of the Karnataka High Court1 setting aside the common order passed by the Additional District Judge Bellary2 under Provincial Insolvency Act, 19203. For the reasons to follow...

1. We have heard learned counsel, Mr. Rituraj Biswas and Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Sr. AAG. Respondent No. 5, despite the service of notice of the pending proceedings, is not represented.

1. The present Appeal has been filed challenging the ex-parte judgment and order dated 16th April 2009 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa acquitting the Respondent No. 1-Accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

1. A tortuous litigative journey since the year 2005, notwithstanding, the matter is before this Court yet again

1. The present Appeal has been filed challenging the ex-parte judgment and order dated 16th April 2009 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa acquitting the Respondent No. 1-Accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

1. Leave granted.

1. We have heard learned counsel, Mr. Rituraj Biswas and Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Sr. AAG. Respondent No. 5, despite the service of notice of the pending proceedings, is not represented.

Heard learned senior counsel and/or counsel for the parties.

Heard learned senior counsel and/or counsel for the parties.