1. This Court's extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invoked by the petitioner, who is a murder convict. As per the custody certificate issued on 14th August, 2025, the petitioner is in...

1. The Appellant before this Court is the unsuccessful Plaintiff in a suit1 for Specific Performance, and the Respondent is the Defendant in the suit.

1. These two writ petitions and one interlocutory application arise out of a set of similar but slightly differentiated facts.

1. The lead appeal1 challenges the judgment and order dated 3rd August, 2021 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in L.P.A. No. 83 of 2019, whereby the High Court allowed the intra-court appeal filed by the respondents...

1. These two writ petitions and one interlocutory application arise out of a set of similar but slightly differentiated facts.

1. These two writ petitions and one interlocutory application arise out of a set of similar but slightly differentiated facts.

1. Heard.

1. Heard.

1. Leave granted.

1. These appeals, at the instance of the appellant-convict, are directed against the judgment and order dated 15th October, 2010, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 270/1997 and Criminal Revision Application No. 346/1997, whereby a...