1. This appeal is directed against impugned judgement dated 01.06.2012 and order dated 03.09.2012 passed in O.A. No. 445 of 2010 and R.A. No. 34 of 2012 by Armed Forces Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”).

1. This Court's extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invoked by the petitioner, who is a murder convict. As per the custody certificate issued on 14th August, 2025, the petitioner is in...

1. These two writ petitions and one interlocutory application arise out of a set of similar but slightly differentiated facts.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Leave granted.

1. This appeal is at the instance of the revenue and is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka dated 17.11.2009 in STA No. 24 of 2006 by which the appeal filed by the respondent herein under...

1. A three-Judge Bench of this Court in this batch of matters, vide order dated 12th August 2025, had referred the following substantial questions of law for consideration of a Constitution Bench:

1. This Court's extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invoked by the petitioner, who is a murder convict. As per the custody certificate issued on 14th August, 2025, the petitioner is in...

1. These two writ petitions and one interlocutory application arise out of a set of similar but slightly differentiated facts.

1. The Appellant before this Court is the unsuccessful Plaintiff in a suit1 for Specific Performance, and the Respondent is the Defendant in the suit.