1. The facts in all these bunch of petitions are almost similar and as such, are decided by this common judgment.

1. Leave granted.

1. A contempt petition has been filed in this Court on 06.11.2020, by the Petitioner herein, who has brought to the notice of this Court the flouting of its directions given vide Order dated 13.02.2020.

1. The appellant is before this Court in this appeal assailing the judgment dated 12.10.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal No. 488/2007.

1. The appellant instituted title suit No. 334 of 2011 in the Court of learned Munsif No. 2, Kamrup Guwahati against the respondent herein seeking for a declaration that on the western boundary of the suit Schedule properties A...

1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand in Review Application No. 105/2008 on 23.04.2008 wherein the factum of death of Pradeep Kumar, the successor-in-interest of Tika Ram ...

1. This appeal arises under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code1, against a judgment the dated 4 January 2021 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2.

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the “NCLAT”) dated 21st December 2018, thereby allowing the appeal filed by respondent herein.

1. These appeals raise interesting questions relatable to Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [the “Arbitration Act, 1996”] which provisions deal inter alia with recognition and enforcement of foreign awards...

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 06.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in Writ Petition No. 2153 of 2016.