1. Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh, has handed over an additional affidavit dated 19.07.2021, pursuant to our order dated 16.07.2021, in which it is stated as follows :—...

1. These six Special Leave Petitions (“SLPs”) by the State of Andhra Pradesh are directed against the respondent-buyers of the property, who were the petitioners before the High Court.

1. Leave granted.

1. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.

1. In a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “the Code”), challenging an order of the trial Court refusing to condone the delay of 862 days in seeking to set aside an ex...

1. In Suo Motu Contempt Petition (Crl.) No. 2 of 2019, three persons namely Vijay S. Kurle, Rashid Khan Pathan and Nilesh C. Ojha were found guilty of contempt vide judgment dated 27.04.2020 passed by this Court.

1. Pursuant to our order dated 14.07.2021, affidavits have been filed by the Union of India, the State of U.P. and the State of Uttarakhand.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. The appeal has been filed after a delay of 584 days and the application for condonation of delay sets out that though the appeal was allowed on 02.07.2018, by the time this order was examined, it was 19.11.2020, i.e, over two...

1. On 30 September 2012, the Government of Uttar Pradesh acceded to a proposal of the Appellant to enhance the age of superannuation of its employees from fifty-eight to sixty years, prospectively.