A. Criminal Law – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Ss. 313 and 432 – Accused’s examination – Explanation of the circumstances against accused – Held on facts, mere denial was not sufficient – Appellant owed proper explanation in...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Gajendra Sharma v. Union of India and Another
1. We have heard Mr. Rajiv Dutta, learned senior counsel.
Delhi Pradesh Rehri Parti Khomcha Hawkers Union and Others v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Others
1. Delay condoned.
Ram Sharan Maurya and Others v. State of U.P. and Others
Except Special Leave Petition (Civil) D. No. 13142 of 2020: (i) permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted in all the concerned matters; and (ii) Special Leave to Appeal is granted in all matters.
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Udayant Malhoutra
1. These statutory appeals have been instituted by the Securities and Exchange Board of India1 under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 19922
Fertico Marketing and Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another
Criminal Trial – Investigation – Irregularity – Consequences, if any, on the trial – CBI undertaking investigating and filing charge-sheet without State Government’s prior consent – Whether trial vitiated – Whether requirement of...
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Others
The instant petition is directed against the order dated 23rd July, 2020 passed by the first respondent relegating the petitioner after serving as member of the Bihar Administrative service for almost 15 years to Bihar Education...
UMC Technologies Private Limited v. Food Corporation of India and Another
1. Leave granted.
Rattan Singh and Others v. Nirmal Gill and Others
A. Evidence Act, 1872 – Ss. 61 to 65 – Documents – Standard of proof – Civil cases – Held, is preponderance of probabilities – Proof beyond reasonable doubt is not the requirement of law – On facts found that execution of a...
Kirpa Ram (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives and Others v. Surendra Deo Gaur and Others
The present appeal has been preferred by Defendant No. 4, against the concurrent findings of three Courts arising out of a suit for permanent injunction.







