1. Leave granted.

1. The present batch of appeals have been filed by the teachers(Associate Professor/Assistant Professor) who were substantively appointed after going through the process of selection provided under the Uttar Pradesh State...

1. On perusal of the affidavit of the respondent, it appears that there are two excuses given for non processing of the file for six months: firstly, that a different commissionerate was being established and in that process...

1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ, order or direction directing respondent Nos. 1 to 3 i.e., Union of India, State of...

1. A Writ Petition was filed by the Appellant challenging the order dated 09.04.2008 passed by the Chennai District Vigilance Committee cancelling the community certificate.

1. The appellant is before this Court in this appeal, assailing the judgment dated 30.10.2009 passed by the High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench in S.A. No. 1303 of 1994.

1. Heard Shri Manjeet Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and also Shri Samar Vijay Singh, learned AAG for the respondent. By the impugned judgment the High Court has interfered with the award passed by the Labour...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn our attention to the order dated 11.12.2009 in terms whereof the DGFT is required to decide the issue as to whether the appellant had complied with condition 6.2 mentioned in page...