1. The plaintiffs are in appeal against the concurrent findings by two courts, rejecting their plaint seeking the relief for permanent injunction.

1. These appeals arise from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 3 January 2020 in a batch of consumer complaints.

1. This judgment decides the reference to three Judges made vide order dated 28th February, 2019 in Civil Appeal No. 2402 of 2019 titled Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corporation,1 as it doubts the legal ratio expressed in...

1. One Shri Ram Bihari Chaubey, the father of the petitioner, was shot dead at his residence in Village Shrikanthpur, Chaubepur, Varanasi in the State of Uttar Pradesh, on 04.12.2015 at around 7.15 AM. An F.I.R. No. 378/2015...

1. Delay condoned.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Leave granted.

1. These two criminal appeals, which have been heard through video conferencing, are directed against the judgment dated 15.03.2010 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby conviction of Rohtas and Sanjay (appellants in...

1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 32 as Public Interest Litigation.

1. These transfer petitions have been filed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India under Article 139-A(1) of the Constitution of India read with Order XL Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 for transfer of several...