A. Sales Tax and VAT — Sales tax — Demand of tax and penalty — Classification of the goods sold by the appellant — Appellant, who is engaged in the sale of electronic goods (survey instruments) imported from other countries...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Eveready Industries India Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
The appellant herein (earlier known as BPL Soft Energy Systems Limited) has challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 12.01.2005 rendered by the High Court of Karnataka whereby three petitions of the appellant...
Anant Prakash Sinha @ Anant Sinha v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Criminal Trial — Alteration or addition of charge — Powers of court — Exercise of — Scope — It can also be done at any time before pronouncement of judgment — It is not necessary to advert to each and every circumstance — If the...
Mahavira Cycle Industries v. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
The learned counsel for the respondents acknowledges that the controversy in hand has been adjudicated upon by this Court in CIT v. Punjab Stainless Steel Industries1 decided on 5-5-2014.
District Collector, Vellore District v. K. Govindaraj
Leave granted.
Dhananjoy Karmakar v. State of West Bengal and Others
The appellant was appointed as an Assistant Teacher (Bengali) sometime in 1996 by the Managing Committee of Kaya Pri Abdur Sobahan Junior High School in Village Kaya, P.O. Gaighata, North 24 Parganas.
Asha Ranjan v. State of Bihar and Ors.
Constitution of India — Art. 32 — Exercise of power by Supreme Court — Murder of journalist allegedly by associates of political executives — Petitioner (Wife) and children living in constant fear as main accused still absconding...
NRB Bearing Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai
It is clear from the aforesaid order of the Tribunal that the Tribunal decided the case on merits against the appellant assessee and rejected the plea of limitation raised by the assessee, as a whole.
Pradeep Kumar etc. etc. v. State of U.P and Anr.
Leave granted.
Subhash & Ors. v. Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The appellants had been, according to them working as Class-IV employees under the respondent-Hospital during two spells. However, there is no record to show that they have been employed by the Hospital and have been paid...







