1. These two appeals are directed against the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh whereby revision under Section 28 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area)...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Priyanka Arya v. Ashutosh Arya
1. This petition has been filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of case being HMA No. 109 of 2020, titled as “Ashutosh Arya v. Priyanka Arya” pending before the Court of Principal Judge...
Padmini Choudhary v. Deepak Kumar Choudhary
1. The report submitted by the Supreme Court Meditation Centre is placed on record along with a copy of a report signed by the Ld. Mediator.
Himalaya Distilleries Limited v. Urmila Pradhan and Others
1. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior Counsel for the respondents.
Nidhi Sethi v. Harsh Kumar
1. As the transfer petition has become infructuous, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the miscellaneous application.
Minal Shardul Shah v. Shardul Narendra Shah
1. This petition has been filed seeking transfer of petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 bearing H.M.P. No. 2487 of 2019, titled as “Shardul Narendra Shah v. Minal Shardul Shah” in the...
Jai Balaji Industries v. D.K. Mohanty and Another
1. By way of these appeals under Section 62 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016,1 the appellant, said to be an operational creditor of the respondent No. 2 company, seeks to question the common order dated 17.08.2021 passed...
Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth and Another v. Chandra Prakash Jain and Another
1. Respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’) which was admitted by the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad bench (hereinafter...
Union of India and Another v. Abhiram Verma
2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:
Placido Francisco Pinto (D) By Lrs and Another v. Jose Francisco Pinto and Another
1. The legal representatives of the plaintiff have appealed before this Court, aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court dated 6.7.2005 affirmed by the High Court in the Second Appeal on 16.8.2006.







