1. The appellant-landlord is before us questioning the common impugned order dated 18.09.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, pursuant to which the application filed by the respondent-tenants seeking condonation...

1. Leave granted.  

1. Leave granted.  

1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 on 1.7.2009 allowing the complaint filed by the respondent2 and directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs...

1. This appeal by special leave, questions a judgment of the Kerala High Court1 reversing the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge and consequently, restoring the conviction and sentence (of 3 years' imprisonment) for the...

1. Leave granted.

1. Special leave granted in all the petitions.

1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad on 30.11.2005 whereby the writ petition filed by the respondents1 was allowed.  

1. Challenging an Order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short “National Commission”), dismissing their consumer complaint on the ground that there was no deficiency in service on the part of the...

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:-