1. The Court is convened through video conference.

1. This appeal is directed against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘NCLAT’ for brevity) dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant.

1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution for seeking a direction to the State of Uttar Pradesh to consider his representation for release from custody in pursuance of the...

1. The Miscellaneous Application has been filed for correction of a typographical error in the judgment dated 24 September 2021.

1. Heard Mr. Ajit Singh Pundir, learned counsel appearing for the appellant (plaintiff).

2. That the parties are governed by the provisions of the MSME Act, 2006.

1. This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis.

1. These appeals arise from a judgment dated 20 December 2019 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in a batch of nine criminal appeals.

2. The Appellant, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, pursuant to the decision of the Government of Maharashtra to reorganize erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board, is a Distribution Licensee under the provisions...

1. Leave granted.