1. On or about 13th December, 2000, the respondent-Company1 approached the appellant-Corporation2 for financial assistance to set up a cold storage unit in the District of Dimapur, Nagaland.kratikrat

1. Heard.

1. The appellant has filed the present appeals challenging the common Judgment and Final Order dated 28/29.11.2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by the Gujarat High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 151 of...

1. This appeal has been preferred by the Appellant challenging the Judgment dated 16.07.2015 (hereinafter referred to as “impugned judgment”) passed in CASE NO. 210/2009 by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New...

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Heard.

1. For convenience of reference, this judgment is divided into the following parts:

1. The present Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 13th April 2011 passed by the Gauhati High Court (Shillong Bench), whereby the appeal filed by the Respondent-wife was allowed and the judgment and decree dated...

1. Leave granted.

2. Brief facts, relevant for the disposal of the present case, are narrated hereinbelow:-