A. Criminal Trial — Circumstantial evidence — Last seen circumstance — Last seen theory is a circumstance, which can be relied — However, conviction cannot be recorded only on the basis of last seen together — Further, if there...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
M/s. EMM ENN Associates v. Commander Works Engineer & Ors.
A. Arbitration — Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 11 — Appointment of arbitrator — Jurisdiction of Chief Justice — Nature of, re-iterated — Chief Justice exercises the judicial power while passing an order under S. 11...
Committee of Management, La Martiniere College Lucknow, Thr. its Principal and Anr. v. Vatsal Gupta and Ors.
Leave granted.
Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Heard Mr. Jayant Bhushan, learned senior counsel, along with Mr. Prasenjit Keswani, learned counsel for the petitioner-Association, Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General along with Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao...
Tara Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
A. Constitution of India — Art. 32 — Remission of sentence — If can be granted — In the present case, the petitioners have been convicted under the NDPS Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for more than 10 yrs and...
State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Lal Singh @ Manjit Singh & Ors.
A. Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Scope of judicial review/ interference — Criminal matters — Premature release — In the present case Respondent was convicted under various provisions of the TADA and IPC and sentenced to life...
Sekhar Suman Verma v. The Superintendent of N.C.B. & Anr.
Narcotics and Intoxicants — Seizure of contraband — Conviction confirmed — Appreciation of evidence — Search and seizure — Procedure as to — If followed — On search, 250 gm of heroin was recovered from the left side pocket of...
High Court of Punjab & Haryana & Ors. v. Jagdev Singh
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed, by its judgment dated 1 August 2005, a petition filed by the Respondent under Article 226 of the Constitution to challenge a direction issued by the State to the Accountant General...
M/s. D.J. Malpani v. Commissionoer of Central Excise, Nashik
Appellant is a manufacturer of goods falling under Chapter 24 of the Schedule of Central Excise Tariff Act. Appellant recovered some amount as Dharmada (Charity) in the invoices from the customers while selling them goods, which...
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Tarini Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors.
A. Infrastructure Laws — Energy and power — Electricity Act, 2003 — Ss. 61, 62 64 and 86 — State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC) — Power to review tariff fixed under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) — If exists — In the...