The limited issue strenuously canvassed before us in this appeal is to the effect that appellant should have been convicted under Section 324 or 326 and not under Section 307 of the IPC and ought to have been inflicted with a...

 Income Tax — Income Tax Act, 1961 — Ss. 271D and 271E — Penalty proceeding — If is independent of the assessment proceeding — Penalty order was passed on the basis of original assessment order — Assessment order set aside —...

Education and Universities — Education — Intermediate Examination — Cancellation of result after 9 years — Propriety — Appellant appeared in the Intermediate Examination conducted by Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, U.P., Allahabad in...

This appeal has been filed against the order dated 10.12.2014 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Miscellaneous Civil Application (For Transfer) No. 2596 of 2014 whereby the High Court dismissed the transfer...

These Interlocutory Applications arise out of Civil Appeal No. 6158 of 2013 which was disposed of by this Court on 24.4.2015. While allowing said appeal preferred by National Highways Authority of India

Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302 or 304 Part-I (S. 300 Clauses) — Murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder — Nature of — Determination — Alteration of sentence — If justified — Allegation that respondent/accused going on...

 Constitution of India — Art. 136 — Powers of Court — Increasing pendency of cases in Apex Court — Interpretation of Art. 136 so as to restrict its scope, possibly with an intention to see that if the Court restricts its...

Cooperative Societies — Cooperative banks — Loan — Default — Jurisdiction of Registrar — When exists — In the present case, bank proved through their witnesses the membership register of the Bank, promissory notes, guarantee...

Environment Protection and Pollution Control — Air pollution — Diesel vehicles — Delhi/NCT Region — Permissibility — Applications filed by Municipal Corporations, Delhi Police and Jal Board seeking permission for registration of...

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General for India, has entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 3. Mr. Nishat Katneshwarkar, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2.