Constitution of India — Art. 254 — To invalidate a legislative or executive act — Power of — Held lies with the Court — Judicial pronouncement, either declaratory or conferring rights on the citizens cannot be set at naught by a...

Income Tax — Tax deduction at source (TDS) — In respect of fees for professional or technical services — Permissibility — Transaction charges paid by a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange to transact business of sale and purchase...

Rent Control and Eviction — Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 — Ss. 12 and 13(2) — Protection to tenant under — Service of notice held, giving an opportunity to the tenant to pay the unpaid rent is the...

Tenancy and Land Laws — Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — S. 218 — Appeal against dismissal of writ petitions — Disbursal of loan amount disputed — On facts, authorities concerned held, directed to disburse the amount in the...

A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 11 — Res judicata — Inapplicability — Previous proceedings would operate as res judicata only in respect of issues of facts and not on issues of pure questions of law when the subsequent suit or...

Labour Law — Retrenchment — Challenge to — Delay — Orders — Art. 142 — Directions issued to pay lumpsum to the retrenched workers, excluding their other statutory benefits

A. Tenancy and Land Laws — Revenue records — Entries in — Whether confers any title — Settled law that mutation of a property in the revenue record does not create or extinguish title nor has it any presumptive value on title —...

A. Criminal Trial — Injured witness — Testimony of — Generally, it is reliable but even an injured witness must be subjected to careful scrutiny if circumstances and materials available on record suggest that he may have falsely...

This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed in public interest by an Advocate practising in this Court highlighting an incident that occurred on 01.02.2011 near Mohammadabad Crossing in Shahjahanpur...

The appellants are aggrieved by the award passed by the Labour Court, Chandrapur, Maharashtra dated 23.09.2005, whereby the respondents have been directed to be reinstated with back wages.