(Uday Umesh Lalit and Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, JJ.)
SLP (Civil) No. 5987 of 2021 [Arising out of SLP(C) Diary No. 14296 of 2019], decided on April 8, 2021
Mukesh Kumar __________________________________ Petitioner;
v.
State of Haryana Through Collector, Gurgaon and Others _____________________________________________ Respondent(s).
With
SLP (Civil) Nos. 22234-22241 of 2018
SLP (Civil) No. 5992 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP(C) Diary No. 14297 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5998 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15662 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5995 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15663 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5986 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15664 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5993 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15665 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5990 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15666 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5999 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15667 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 6000 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15668 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 6001 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15669 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5997 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15691 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5989 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15700 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5988 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15702 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5994 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15939 of 2019)
SLP (C) No. 5996 of 2021
(Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15943 of 2019)
SLP (Civil) No. 5987 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP(C) Diary No. 14296 of 2019); SLP (Civil) Nos. 22234-22241 of 2018; SLP (Civil) No. 5992 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP(C) Diary No. 14297 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5998 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15662 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5995 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15663 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5986 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15664 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5993 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15665 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5990 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15666 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5999 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15667 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 6000 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15668 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 6001 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15669 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5997 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15691 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5989 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15700 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5988 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15702 of 2019); SLP (C) No. 5994 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15939 of 2019); and SLP (C) No. 5996 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 15943 of 2019)
The Order of the Court was delivered by
Uday Umesh Lalit, J.:—
1. These special leave petitions filed by various land holders seek to challenge the decision dated 09.03.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 2373 of 2010 (O&M) and other connected matters) i.e. in Madan Pal-III v. State of Haryana9. This decision of the High Court was subject matter of challenge in this Court which was dealt with by the Judgment in Wazir v. State of Haryana2.
2. In all these cases there has been delay in preferring special leave petitions. However, considering the facts on record, we condone the delay.
3. The Judgment passed by this Court in Wazir v. State of Haryana2 as explained by the instant Order in M.A. Nos. 926-930 of 2019 and IA No. 118262 of 2019 herein above is to apply to all cases of land holders from the concerned villages under the present acquisition.
4. Since all the issues already stand dealt with by the Judgment in Wazir v. State of Haryana2, nothing further need be done in the present petitions except to state that these cases shall be governed in every respect by the directions issued by this Court in its Judgment in Wazir v. State of Haryana2, as explained by the instant Order.
5. The petitions stand disposed of in above terms.
———
