Latest Judgments

Krishna Nand Shukla v. Director of Higher Education Allahabad and Others

Learned counsel for the petitioner says that there is an error apparent on the face of the record inasmuch as there is no paragraph 3(i) in the counter affidavit filed by the State Government nor is there any paragraph 6 of the rejoinder affidavit, as quoted in the impugned order1.

(Madan B. Lokur and S.A. Bobde, JJ.)

Krishna Nand Shukla ________________________________ Petitioner;

v.

Director of Higher Education Allahabad and Others ___ Respondent(s).

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report)

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32742/2015, decided on November 30, 2015

The Order of the court was delivered by


Order

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that there is an error apparent on the face of the record inasmuch as there is no paragraph 3(i) in the counter affidavit filed by the State Government nor is there any paragraph 6 of the rejoinder affidavit, as quoted in the impugned order1. He says that he would like to file a review petition.

2. Liberty granted.

3. The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. In case, the review petition is dismissed, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the impugned order before this Court.

———

1 Krishna Nand Shukla v. Director of Higher Education Allahabad, Writ A No. 29473 of 1999, order dated 6-10-2015 (All)