(Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.)
Dr. Jitendra Gupta __________________________________ Petitioner;
v.
Union of India and Another _______________________ Respondent(s).
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 338/2017, decided on May 9, 2017
(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 338/2017
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the record. Particularly, we have seen the grievance of the petitioner of being implicating in the criminal case which was quashed. It has been submitted that I.A.S. officers Association gave a memorandum in support of the petitioner.
2. In these circumstances, the representation of the petitioner has to be considered by the concerned administrative authorities and not by the Court. Accordingly, we direct respondent No. 1 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take such appropriate action as may be considered appropriate within three months from today.
3. The writ petition is disposed of.
4. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
———
