(Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Indu Malhotra, JJ.)
Dharmendra Kumar Singh _________________________ Appellant;
v.
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others ________________ Respondent(s).
Civil Appeal No(s). 12202/2018, decided on July 15, 2020
(For Direction IA No. 63684/2019 – Exemption From Filing O.T. IA No. 63672/2019 – Permission to File Additional Documents/Facts/Annexures) With C.A. No. 11368/2018 (IA No. 57660/2019 – Clarification/Direction IA No. 50301/2019 – Permission to File Additional Documents/Facts/Annexures) C.A. No. 8804-8805/2019 C.A. No. 5257/2019 C.A. No. 5093/2019 (IA No. 149662/2019 – Exemption From Filing O.T. IA No. 104744/2019 – Exemption From Filing O.T. IA No. 104740/2019 – Permission to File Additional Documents/Facts/Annexures IA No. 149661/2019 – Permission to File Additional Documents/Facts/Annexures) C.A. No. 7002/2019 (IA No. 129677/2019-Exemption From Filing C/c of the Impugned Judgment and IA No. 129675/2019-Ex-Parte Stay and IA No. 129682/2019-Exemption From Filing O.T. and IA No. 129673/2019-Permission to File Appeal and IA No. 129680/2019-Permission to File Lengthy List of Dates and IA No. 129683/2019-Permission to File Additional Documents/Facts/Annexures)
Civil Appeal No(s). 12202/2018; IA No. 63684/2019; IA No. 63672/2019; C.A. No. 11368/2018; IA No. 57660/2019; IA No. 50301/2019; C.A. No. 8804-8805/2019; C.A. No. 5257/2019; C.A. No. 5093/2019; IA No. 149662/2019; IA No. 104744/2019; IA No. 104740/2019; IA No. 149661/2019; C.A. No. 7002/2019; IA No. 129677/2019; IA No. 129675/2019; IA No. 129682/2019; IA No. 129673/2019; IA No. 129680/2019; and IA No. 129683/2019
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. An adjournment slip has been circulated by the learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh. Learned counsel, however, states that the undertaking given to this Court on 5th June, 2020 has been complied with inasmuch as the Notification was issued on 15th June, 2020.
2. The only other issue which remains as noticed in the last order is the extension of the lease for the period the mining leases were not permitted to operate. Learned counsel assures us that a decision would be taken within a maximum period of fifteen days from today. He also expressed some apprehensions about the interdicts by the High Court. We see no reason for such apprehensions and we had clarified all these aspects on the last date. It is the State Government which has to take a decision and thereafter this Court can give its imprimatur to the decision which will be taken by the State Government and thus, the High Court interdicts would not come in the way.
3. List in the week commencing 4th August, 2020.
———
