(Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.)
Debashish Pal Chowdhury ___________________________ Petitioner;
v.
Sanjeev Ranjan and Others ______ Alleged Contemnors/Respondent(s).
Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 1706/2017 in SLP(C) No. 18993-19049/2014, decided on October 24, 2017
(For Admission and IA No. 85160/2017-Clarification/Direction and IA No. 106840/2017-Intervention/Impleadment)
Conmt. Pet.(C) No. 1706/2017; SLP(C) No. 18993-19049/2014; IA No. 85160/2017; and IA No. 106840/2017
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. In continuation of proceedings dated 4-10-20171, learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn our attention to the additional affidavit filed by the Respondent No. 1 to show that all the steps leading to notification dated 19th May, 2017 have been taken only after the judgment of this Court dated 29-3-20172, which is with a view to flout the order of this Court. It was further submitted that the object is to continue in service all those whose appointments were quashed and were found to be for extraneous reasons.
2. Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the Chief Secretary, Education, Tripura, states that the appointments which are impugned in the present proceedings are proposed to be initiated only after the completion of the selection of teachers which is likely to be over by 31st December, 2017.
3. In view of the above, list the matter on 16th January, 2018. Interim order to continue.
———
1 Debashish Pal Chowdhury v. Sanjeev Ranjan, Contempt Petition (C) No. 1706 of 2017 in SLP(C) Nos. 18993-19049 of 2014, order dated 4-10-2017 (SC)
2 State of Tripura v. Tanmoy Nath, SLP (C) No(s). 18993-19049 of 2014, order dated 29-3-2017 (SC)
