(M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.)
Commissioner of Service Tax ________________________ Appellant;
v.
Inox Leisure Ltd. ________________________________ Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 1335 of 2022, decided on February 28, 2022
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, ‘CESTAT’). The CESTAT has taken an absolutely correct view, to which we agree. Hence, the Civil Appeal stands dismissed.
Civil Appeal No. 1335/2022
Commissioner of Service Tax _________________________ Appellant
v.
Inox Leisure Ltd __________________________________. Respondent
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No. 22488/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
Date: 28-02-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
(Before M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.)
For Appellant(s) Mr. N. Venkataraman ASG
Mr. M.K. Maroria, AOR
Ms. Nisha Bagchi Adv
Ms. Praveena Gautam Adv
Mr. Shekhar Vyas, Adv
Mr. Neela Kedar Gokhale Adv
For Respondent(s) Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Gopal Mundhra, Adv.
Ms. Ginita Bodani, Adv.
Mr. Udit Jain, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Vikas, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
ORDER
2. The Civil Appeal stands dismissed in terms of the signed order.
3. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
———
