Category - Latest Judgments

Leave granted.

We have heard Mr. Devashish Bharuka, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr. Ashok Grover, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents and Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the State of...

In view of the said position reflected in the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the respondent was confronted therewith. He submitted that he has no objection if the matters are remitted to the High Court for fresh...

Contract and Specific Relief — Specific Relief Act, 1963 — S. 38 — Suit for permanent injunction — Decree — Plaintiff seeking injunction against original defendant contending inter alia that the suit schedule property was taken...

Service Law — Retirement benefits including payment of salary — Entitlement to — Petitioner who as Assistant Godown Manager in the Respondent 1/Corporation, was to be retire on reaching the age of superannuation, namely, 58 years...

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant prays for liberty to withdraw I.A. No. 219 for intervention. He is permitted to do so. Accordingly, I.A. No. 219 is closed on withdrawal.

Leave granted.

In paragraph 25 of the judgment dated 23.02.2016 (by Mr. Prafulla C. Pant, J.) instead of words “Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949” the words “Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949” shall be substituted and in...

Though a letter for adjournment has been circulated, yet learned counsel for the parties submitted that the time fixed vide order dated 08.12.2015 should be extended.

Learned counsel for the State of Chhattisgarh shall file a report indicating the status of the criminal proceedings launched against the respondents.