Category - Latest Judgments

1. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, ‘CESTAT’).

1. The present appeals have been preferred against the judgment dated 07.05.2010 passed by the Bombay High Court in a Public Interest Litigation, being PIL No. 47 of 2008.

1. The moot point arising for consideration in the present appeal is whether in the case of certain witnesses being declared as protected witnesses in the exercise of powers under Section 173(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

1. The seminal question involved in these cases is: whether it is open to the District Magistrate1 or the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate2 to appoint an advocate and authorise him/her to take possession of the secured assets and...

1. Though the matter is posted for directions but, having regard to the circumstances of the case and the issues involved, we have heard learned amicus curiae and learned counsel for the State finally at this stage itself.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 28.09.2020 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in M.F.A. No. 3183 of 2018 (MV), the original claimant has preferred the present...

1. On 1st October, 2021, the present Transfer Petition was disposed of by directing that the title suit subject matter of this petition shall be transferred to the District Court at Siliguri, West Bengal.

1. Along with I.A. No. 170013 of 2021, a copy of settlement deed dated 24th December, 2021 duly signed by the parties to the petition has been placed on record.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for petitioner.

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the Transfer Petition.