Category - Latest Judgments

1. Leave granted.

1. The present Civil Appeals arise out of a common judgement and order dated 21.10.2021 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (for short “SAT”), wherein the Tribunal dismissed the Appeals No. 375 and 376 of 2021 filed by...

2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.

2. The parties are governed by the provisions of the MSMED Act, 2006.

1. As common questions of law and facts arise in this group of appeals from the same land acquisition proceedings, all these appeals are decided and disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under:  

2. Feeling aggrieved with the order passed by the Uttarakhand Public Service Tribunal, Dehradun (for short “Tribunal”) in Claim Petition No. 104/DB/2009, by which the Tribunal directed the Department to ignore the un-communicated...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 29.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 33 of 2014 by which the High Court has allowed...

2. That the Corporate Debtor was a private sector Ship Building Yard with its manufacturing activities at Dahej Yard and Surat Yard in Gujarat and having its corporate office at Mumbai.

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree in Regular Second Appeal No. 372 of 2003 dated 03.10.2008, whereby the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore has dismissed the appeal.