A. Labour Law — Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 — Ss. 5 and 14 — Grocery Markets or Shops Unprotected Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Chandrakant Adinath Utture v. State of Maharashtra & Others
Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 — Ss. 13(1)(a), (b), (c) and 13(2), 14 — Government notification declaring the extent of area constituting affected and benefitted zones and the slab under Part II of...
A.K. Saxena v. State Bank of Patiala & Ors.
The Appellant entered the service of the respondent No. 1 on 21.10.1978 as Cashier-cum-Clerk. On 16.04.1991 a complaint was made by a customer-Hari Shankar Yadav regarding fraudulent withdrawal of an amount of Rs. 80,000/...
Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P. & Anr.
It is submitted by Mr. Pradeep Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that there has been a typographical error in describing the name of the respondent No. 2.
Research Foundation, Sci., Tech. & Eco. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Biodiversity — Conservation of — Direction sought to set up a permanent department/Committee/Board which shall be competent/responsible to take appropriate actions to protect biodiversity and...
Ram Laxman v. State of Rajasthan
A. Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 302/149 and 148 — Murder — Conviction — Appreciation of evidence — Allegation that appellants, armed with Gupti and Sword respectively, assaulted deceased — Appellants and five other were tried together...
Amanullah and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
A. Criminal Law — Criminal trial — Appeal to Supreme Court/Appeal under Art. 136 — Third person — Locus standi — If exists — Though traditional view of ‘locus standi’ has been that the person who is aggrieved or affected has the...
Union of India v. Tata Teleservices Ltd.
As fresh demands have been issued in supersession of the original demands, we find no error in the approach taken by the Tribunal, in the facts of this case.
State of U.P. & Ors. v. Vinod Kumar
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
Smt. Ajambi (Dead) by LR. v. Roshanbi & Others
Muslim Law — Partition — Suit for partition and separate possession — Property in question originally belonged to late “S”, whose first wife had died and thereafter he had married “R” — Out of the first marriage with “H”, late...

