Heard Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Raj Kamal, learned counsel for the petitioner No. 1, Mr. V. Madhukar, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Punjab and Mr. Abhishek Singh, learned...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Commnr. of Central Excise, Chennai v. M/s. Addisons Paints & Chemicals Ltd.
A. Excise — Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 — Ch. 32 — Excise duty — Liability to pay — Respondent, a manufacturer of paints and varnishes — Question whether duty paid on the cost of cartons — Can be included in the assessable...
Delhi Development Authority v. Shravan Gupta and Others
Leave granted.
Commnr. of Central Excise, Vadodara v. M/s. Inarco Ltd.
Excise — Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 — Schedule Chapter 68, Sub- heading No. 6807 — Central Excise Rules, 1944 — R. 19-B — Excide duty — Respondent, a manufacturer of blended marble vinyl flooring, claimed that same comes...
Nandkishor Savalaram Malu (Dead) Through Lrs. v. Hanumanmal G. Biyani (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
Leave granted.
Public Interest Foundation & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
Election — Representation of People Act, 1951 — Ss. 123, 125-A, 8(1), 8(2) and 8(3) — Disqualification on conviction — Two issues raised for consideration, namely, (a) whether disqualification should be triggered upon conviction...
Kamta Yadav & Ors. v. State of Bihar
Criminal Law — Criminal Trial — Witnesses — Interested/Partisan witness — Interested witness — Testimony — Requirement while scrutinising — Held, only requirement, while scrutinising the interested witnesses, is to examine their...
Kali Aerated Water Works, Salem v. Commnr. of Central Excise, Madurai
Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — Schedule — Excise duty — Exemption — Appellant, a Small Scale Industrial Unit (SSI Unit) was manufacturing Aerated Water under various brand names using the trade mark with the “Kalimark” — It...
Rajendra Kumar Meshram v. Vanshmani Prasad Verma and Anr.
The election of the appellant to the No. 81 Deosar Constituency of Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly which was held on 11.05.2013 has been set aside by the High Court in an election petition filed by the respondent No. 1 herein.
State of U.P. v. Satveer & Ors.
Criminal Trial — Appreciation of evidence — Acquittal — Last seen theory — If applied properly — Respondents were charged under S. 302 r/w S. 34 IPC for allegedly committing murder of a child — The dead body of deceased was found...

