Penal Code, 1860 — S. 304-A — Sentence — Quantum of, held to be absolutely inadequate — Hence, the lawmakers suggested to scrutinise, relook and revisit the sentencing policy in S. 304-A — Matter directed to be listed on certain...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Tata Steel Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand & Others
Property Law — Government Grants Act, 1895 — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Bihar Industrial Areas Development Authority Act, 1974 — Appeal against judgment and order of High Court dismissing writ petition filed by the...
Sumer Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Narendra Gorani
The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.03.2015 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No. 572 of 2013 whereby it has concurred with the view expressed by...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Gurgaon v. M/s. Pashupati SPG.&WVG. Mills Ltd.
Excise — Central Excise — Central Excise Act, 1944 — By allowing the appeal the appellate authority rejected the contention of the revenue that the yarn in question was manufactured out of fibres — Appeal — Held, the appellate...
Raish Khan v. State of Rajasthan
Criminal Trial — Appeal against conviction — Findings to be given on the basis of the available material — High Court simply upheld order of trial court after recording the submissions of the parties — No discussion on merits of...
Orissa Olympic Association Th. Gen. Secretary v. State of Orissa and Anr.
A. Audit — Audit directed by Court — Report submitted — Procedure thereof — Accountant and auditor general, Odisha submitted his report pertaining to “the accounts in respect of Kalyan Mandap and 23 shops standing on the disputed...
Board of Trustees of Port of Mumbai v. Nikhil N. Gupta & Anr.
Heard.
Qamar Hasan Khan and Others v. State of U.P. and Others
It is submitted by Mr. Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for the State, that the candidates who have been extended the benefit of relaxation shall be sent for training and thereafter the letters of appointment would ensue.
Delhi Development Authority v. Ram Singh and Ors.
Leave granted.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa v. Bhagyanagar Metals Limited
Excise — Excise duty — Cellular telephones were imported by the assesses — Valuation of — Assessees had sought to clear the goods by classifying them under Custom Tariff Heading 8525.20.17 — Along with the cellular phones, the...