1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 22.12.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi whereby an application filed in the pending writ petition was allowed, holding that the acquisition proceedings stand lapsed...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Mohammad Azam Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh
1. Both the writ petition being Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 188 of 2022, as well as the Interlocutory Application No. 71580 of 2022 in Miscellaneous Application No. 766 of 2022 in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 39 of 2022 have...
Union of India and Another v. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. through Director
1. The Union of India1 is in appeal against a judgment of a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court dated 23 January 2020. The High Court allowed a petition instituted by the respondents under Article 226 for challenging the...
C.C., C.E. & S.T. – Bangalore (Adjudication) etc. v. Northern Operating Systems Pvt. Ltd.
1. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (hereafter variously described as “the revenue” or “the appellant”) has preferred appeals1, directed against the impugned orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax...
Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority etc. v. Shakuntla Education and Welfare Society and Others
1. Leave granted.
Canara Bank v. G.S. Jayarama
1. This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis.
Employees State Insurance Corporation and Another v. Dr. Vinay Kumar and Others
1. Leave granted.
Chopra Fabricators and Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. v. Bharat Pumps and Compressors Ltd. and Another
1. This Court, on 28.04.2022, passed a detailed order directing the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad/The Registrar General of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and the Lucknow Bench emphasizing the need for the High...
All India Football Federation v. Rahul Mehra and Others
1. Application for intervention1 is allowed.
Commissioner of CGST & Service Tax, Mumbai East v. V. Trans (India) Ltd.
1. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that in the facts of the case, no interference is called for.

