Category - Latest Judgments

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in Land Acquisition Appeal No. 79 of 2015 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by...

2. We have heard Shri Nitin Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Shri Amit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1.

2. The facts leading to the present petition for Special Leave to Appeal in a nutshell are as under:—

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court it appears that though in the counter affidavit filed before the High Court filed by the Land Acquisition Collector it was stated that the possession was taken on...

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court it appears that though it was submitted before the High Court that the possession of the land in question was taken on 16.03.2004, however thereafter relying upon...

1. These two appeals are directed against the final orders dated 29.04.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench (hereinafter referred to as ‘High Court’) in two Miscellaneous Appeals (being S.B...

1. Leave granted.

1. Against the order passed by the Commissioner of Appeals, the petitioner has a remedy available to approach the ITAT.

1. Leave Granted.

1. By award dated 14.04.2000, the appellant, M/s. Nepa Limited, was held liable to pay Rs. 14,49,300/- to the respondent, Manoj Kumar Agrawal.