Category - Latest Judgments

1. Heard Mr. Jayanth Nath, learned senior counsel for the appellant. Neither the counsel for the High Court nor that of the contesting respondents would want to make their submissions.

1. Leave granted.

2. Facts in brief giving rise to the present appeals are as under:  

1. In view of the aforesaid factual background, we do not find any good ground and reason to interfere with the final conclusion and decision of the High Court.

1. As all the three appeals are with respect to the same Assessee and with respect to the same period but with respect to the service tax liability and the penalty on such service tax liability, all the three appeals are decided...

1. Leave granted.

1. The appeal challenges the judgment dated 28th January 2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No. 3205 of 2007 (O&M), thereby dismissing the...

1. Leave granted.

1. What was challenged before the High Court was the Assessment Order. Against the order of assessment, there is a further appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 16.08.2017 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Tax Appeal No. 68 of 2016, by which the High Court has dismissed the said Appeal preferred...