Category - Latest Judgments

2. In the enforcement proceedings being OMP (EFA) (Comm.) No. 6 of 2016 initiated by Daiichi, an apprehension was expressed that the Respondents were engaging in designs to move the assets outside the reach of Daiichi.

1. This petition for review was listed for open Court hearing, since it was mentioned and submitted that this Court had overlooked the judgment of this Court in E.S. Krishnamurthy v. Bharath Hi-Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. reported in...

1. The Miscellaneous Application for clarification/modification has been filed by Ms. Archana, a resident of Village Bhawariya, Tehsil Kukshi, District Dhar in the State of Madhya Pradesh.

1. This appeal is of the claimants, which arises out of the Impugned Judgment dated 05.04.2017 by the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi Bench in an appeal against the order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short, the...

1. This appeal is of the Claimants which arises out of the Impugned Judgement dated 30.01.2019 by the High Court of Madras in an appeal against the order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai (for short, the “Tribunal”)...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 29.06.2009 passed by the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Authority’) in Appeal No. 330/CST/2008, by...

2. We have heard Shri Varinder Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Shri Abdul Qadir Abbasi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2 - accused.

1. This interlocutory application has been moved by the respondent in the civil appeal.