1. Since the issues raised in all the captioned appeals are the same and the challenge is also to the self same order passed by the National Green Tribunal, Southern Zone, Chennai, (for short, “NGT, Chennai”), those were taken up...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
State of Goa v. Summit Online Trade Solutions (P) Ltd. and Others
1. Leave granted.
Ganesh Prasad v. Rajeshwar Prasad and Others
1. Leave granted.
Victory Iron Works Ltd. v. Jitendra Lohia and Another
1. These appeals arise out of a common Order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1 Principal Bench dismissing two independent appeals filed by the appellants herein, against an Order of the National Company Law...
Manoj Kumar Jindal v. Rajni Mahajan and Others
1. The order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana upholding the order passed by the Single Bench is under challenge before this Court.
Nand Lal and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh
1. Leave granted in SLP(Criminal) Nos. 6134-6135 of 2019.
Mohinder Singh (Dead) Through Lrs and Another v. Narain Singh and Others
1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 22nd November, 2012 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi holding that once the rural area is urbanized by issuance of a notification under...
Union of India and Others v. Union Carbide Corporation and Others
1. A horrendous tragedy occurred on the night of 2nd and 3rd December 1984, due to the escape of deadly chemical fumes from the factory owned and operated by M/s Union Carbide India Limited (hereinafter referred as ‘UCIL’) in...
Government of NCT of Delhi and Another v. Dayanand and Another
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 1754 of 2015, by which, the High Court has allowed the said writ petition and has...
Government of NCT of Delhi and Others v. Jai Pal
2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, it appears that it was the specific case on behalf of the appellants herein - original respondents that the possession of the land in question was taken on 11.07...

