Category - Latest Judgments

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court it appears that though in the counter affidavit filed before the High Court filed by the Land Acquisition Collector it was stated that the possession was taken on...

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court it appears that though it was submitted before the High Court that the possession of the land in question was taken on 16.03.2004, however thereafter relying upon...

1. These two appeals are directed against the final orders dated 29.04.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench (hereinafter referred to as ‘High Court’) in two Miscellaneous Appeals (being S.B...

1. Leave granted.

1. Against the order passed by the Commissioner of Appeals, the petitioner has a remedy available to approach the ITAT.

1. These Criminal Appeals have been filed assailing the impugned judgment and order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal Nos. 947 and 948 of 2009 by which the judgment of conviction...

1. By award dated 14.04.2000, the appellant, M/s. Nepa Limited, was held liable to pay Rs. 14,49,300/- to the respondent, Manoj Kumar Agrawal.

1. These two appeals take exception to the judgment dated 31st July 2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh by which conviction of the appellants has been confirmed.

1. By the order dated 01.05.2009, notice in the special leave petition was confined to the first respondent - Gurbachan Singh.

1. Delay condoned.