Category - Latest Judgments

1. Against the order passed by the Commissioner of Appeals, the petitioner has a remedy available to approach the ITAT.

1. Leave Granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in Land Acquisition Appeal No. 79 of 2015 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by...

2. We have heard Shri Nitin Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Shri Amit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1.

2. The facts leading to the present petition for Special Leave to Appeal in a nutshell are as under:—

1. By award dated 14.04.2000, the appellant, M/s. Nepa Limited, was held liable to pay Rs. 14,49,300/- to the respondent, Manoj Kumar Agrawal.

1. These Criminal Appeals have been filed assailing the impugned judgment and order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal Nos. 947 and 948 of 2009 by which the judgment of conviction...

1. These two appeals take exception to the judgment dated 31st July 2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh by which conviction of the appellants has been confirmed.

1. By the order dated 01.05.2009, notice in the special leave petition was confined to the first respondent - Gurbachan Singh.

1. Delay condoned.